EPYC 9375F vs Celeron G6900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1674not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency5.88no data
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Turin (2024)
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,306

Detailed specifications

Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Performance-cores2no data
Threads264
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1700SP5
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 710N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2022 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 320 Watt

Celeron G6900 has 595.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9375F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G6900 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9375F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G6900 and EPYC 9375F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G6900
Celeron G6900
AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 170 votes

Rate Celeron G6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G6900 or EPYC 9375F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.