Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Celeron G5900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G5900
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 58 Watt
1.66
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
52.69
+3074%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron G5900 by a whopping 3074% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G5900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking206327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.03
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency2.7117.81
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date30 April 2020 (4 years ago)14 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G5900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G5900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G5900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G5900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G5900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G5900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610-
Max video memory64 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G5900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G5900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+-
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hz-
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G5900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12-
OpenGL4.5-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G5900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G5900 1.66
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 52.69
+3074%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G5900 2643
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 83697
+3067%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G5900 663
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 1579
+138%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G5900 1045
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 13954
+1235%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.66 52.69
Recency 30 April 2020 14 July 2020
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron G5900 has 382.8% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, on the other hand, has a 3074.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G5900 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G5900 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G5900 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G5900
Celeron G5900
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 77 votes

Rate Celeron G5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 825 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G5900 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.