i3-10100F vs Celeron G555

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G555
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.87
Core i3-10100F
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.51
+533%

Core i3-10100F outperforms Celeron G555 by a whopping 533% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G555 and Core i3-10100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25481147
Place by popularitynot in top-10019
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0520.08
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.278.02
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)12 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-10100F has 40060% better value for money than Celeron G555.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G555 and Core i3-10100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G555 and Core i3-10100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G555 and Core i3-10100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G555 and Core i3-10100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G555 and Core i3-10100F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G555 and Core i3-10100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G555 and Core i3-10100F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G555 and Core i3-10100F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G555 0.87
i3-10100F 5.51
+533%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G555 1388
i3-10100F 8755
+531%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 5.51
Recency 1 September 2012 12 October 2020
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

i3-10100F has a 533.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-10100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G555 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G555 and Core i3-10100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G555
Celeron G555
Intel Core i3-10100F
Core i3-10100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 10 votes

Rate Celeron G555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7576 votes

Rate Core i3-10100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G555 or Core i3-10100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.