Celeron N2940 vs G555

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G555
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.87
+31.8%
Celeron N2940
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.66

Celeron G555 outperforms Celeron N2940 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G555 and Celeron N2940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25502742
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.278.92
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)22 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G555 and Celeron N2940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.25 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G555 and Celeron N2940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G555 and Celeron N2940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Connectno data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G555 and Celeron N2940 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G555 and Celeron N2940 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G555 and Celeron N2940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s21.32 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1 GHz854 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G555 and Celeron N2940 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G555 and Celeron N2940.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G555 0.87
+31.8%
Celeron N2940 0.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G555 1388
+33%
Celeron N2940 1044

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 0.66
Recency 1 September 2012 22 May 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron G555 has a 31.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N2940, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 828.6% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G555 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2940 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G555 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2940 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G555 and Celeron N2940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G555
Celeron G555
Intel Celeron N2940
Celeron N2940

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 10 votes

Rate Celeron G555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 106 votes

Rate Celeron N2940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G555 or Celeron N2940, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.