Celeron P4500 vs G540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G540
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.74
+39.6%
Celeron P4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53

Celeron G540 outperforms Celeron P4500 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G540 and Celeron P4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26762863
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.081.43
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)28 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$158no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G540 and Celeron P4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C90 °C
Number of transistors504 million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G540 and Celeron P4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G540 and Celeron P4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Celeron G540 and Celeron P4500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G540 and Celeron P4500 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G540 and Celeron P4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G540 and Celeron P4500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G540 and Celeron P4500.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G540 0.74
+39.6%
Celeron P4500 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G540 1182
+39.4%
Celeron P4500 848

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 0.53
Recency 4 September 2011 28 March 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron G540 has a 39.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Celeron P4500, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G540 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron P4500 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G540 is a desktop processor while Celeron P4500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G540 and Celeron P4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G540
Celeron G540
Intel Celeron P4500
Celeron P4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 106 votes

Rate Celeron G540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 8 votes

Rate Celeron P4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G540 or Celeron P4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.