Athlon 240GE vs Celeron G540

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G540
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.77

Athlon 240GE outperforms Celeron G540 by a whopping 284% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G540 and Athlon 240GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26541661
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.023.42
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.087.71
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)6 September 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$158$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 240GE has 17000% better value for money than Celeron G540.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G540 and Athlon 240GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G540 and Athlon 240GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G540 and Athlon 240GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G540 and Athlon 240GE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G540 and Athlon 240GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G540 and Athlon 240GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G540 and Athlon 240GE integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G540 and Athlon 240GE.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G540 0.77
Athlon 240GE 2.96
+284%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G540 1181
Athlon 240GE 4527
+283%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 2.96
Recency 4 September 2011 6 September 2018
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon 240GE has a 284.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 240GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G540 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G540 and Athlon 240GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G540
Celeron G540
AMD Athlon 240GE
Athlon 240GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 106 votes

Rate Celeron G540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 60 votes

Rate Athlon 240GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G540 or Athlon 240GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.