Ryzen 7 8700F vs Celeron G4900

Place in the ranking	2134	285
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.95	53.28
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	2.63	28.55
Architecture codename	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date	2 April 2018 (6 years ago)	1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$42	$270

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 8700F has 1706% better value for money than Celeron G4900.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G4900 and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	2	16
Base clock speed	3.1 GHz	4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.1 GHz	5 GHz
Bus type	DMI 3.0	no data
Bus rate	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	31	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB	16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm
Die size	126 mm²	178 mm²
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	25,000 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	no data
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G4900 and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	FCLGA1151	AM5
Power consumption (TDP)	54 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G4900 and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron G4900 and Ryzen 7 8700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
MPX	+	-
Identity Protection	+	-
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G4900 and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G4900 and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	DDR5
Maximum memory size	64 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	38.397 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel UHD Graphics 610	N/A
Max video memory	64 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	1.05 GHz	no data
InTru 3D	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G4900 and Ryzen 7 8700F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G4900 and Ryzen 7 8700F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	+	no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	4096x2304@24Hz	no data
Max resolution over eDP	4096x2304@60Hz	no data
Max resolution over DisplayPort	4096x2304@60Hz	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G4900 and Ryzen 7 8700F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	12	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G4900 and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe version	3.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	16	20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G4900 1.56

Ryzen 7 8700F 20.35
+1204%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G4900 2394

Ryzen 7 8700F 31136
+1201%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.56	20.35
Recency	2 April 2018	1 April 2024
Physical cores	2	8
Threads	2	16
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	54 Watt	65 Watt

Celeron G4900 has 20.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 8700F, on the other hand, has a 1204.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 8700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G4900 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G4900 and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.