Duron 1100 vs Celeron G4900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2138not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.95no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Duron
Power efficiency2.65no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)K7 (2000−2004)
Release date2 April 2018 (6 years ago)30 January 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0FSB
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s200 MT/s
Multiplier3111
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB64 KB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm180 nm
Die size126 mm2105.68 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151no data
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt50.3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size64 GB4 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2018 30 January 2002
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 50 Watt

Celeron G4900 has an age advantage of 16 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

Duron 1100, on the other hand, has 8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G4900 and Duron 1100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900
AMD Duron 1100
Duron 1100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 115 votes

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 11 votes

Rate Duron 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G4900 or Duron 1100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.