Xeon E-2456 vs Celeron G470

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G470
2013
1 core / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.36
Xeon E-2456
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
14.96
+4056%

Xeon E-2456 outperforms Celeron G470 by a whopping 4056% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G470 and Xeon E-2456 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3036469
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data93.22
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.9717.70
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$375

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G470 and Xeon E-2456 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5.1 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s16 GT/s
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G470 and Xeon E-2456 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G470 and Xeon E-2456. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G470 and Xeon E-2456 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G470 and Xeon E-2456 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G470 and Xeon E-2456. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G470 and Xeon E-2456 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G470 and Xeon E-2456.

PCIe version2.05
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G470 0.36
Xeon E-2456 14.96
+4056%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G470 570
Xeon E-2456 23770
+4070%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 14.96
Recency 1 April 2013 14 December 2023
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 2 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

Celeron G470 has 128.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2456, on the other hand, has a 4055.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

The Xeon E-2456 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G470 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G470 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2456 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G470 and Xeon E-2456, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G470
Celeron G470
Intel Xeon E-2456
Xeon E-2456

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 14 votes

Rate Celeron G470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2456 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G470 or Xeon E-2456, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.