Ultra 5 226V vs Celeron G470
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G470 and Core Ultra 5 226V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 649 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | no data | 65.86 |
Architecture codename | no data | Lunar Lake (2024) |
Release date | 1 April 2013 (11 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron G470 and Core Ultra 5 226V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 4.5 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 37 MHz |
L1 cache | no data | 192 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 2.5 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 3 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 66 °C | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G470 and Core Ultra 5 226V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1155 | Intel BGA 2833 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G470 and Core Ultra 5 226V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron G470 and Core Ultra 5 226V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G470 and Core Ultra 5 226V are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G470 and Core Ultra 5 226V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors | Arc 130V |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G470 and Core Ultra 5 226V integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G470 and Core Ultra 5 226V.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 April 2013 | 24 September 2024 |
Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 17 Watt |
Ultra 5 226V has an age advantage of 11 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G470 and Core Ultra 5 226V. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G470 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 226V is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G470 and Core Ultra 5 226V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.