Xeon E-2334 vs Celeron G460

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G460 and Xeon E-2334 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated918
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiencyno data11.92
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date12 December 2011 (12 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G460 and Xeon E-2334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature66 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G460 and Xeon E-2334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G460 and Xeon E-2334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G460 and Xeon E-2334 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G460 and Xeon E-2334 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G460 and Xeon E-2334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G460 and Xeon E-2334 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G460 and Xeon E-2334.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G460 469
Xeon E-2334 13011
+2674%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G460 285
Xeon E-2334 1620
+468%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G460 385
Xeon E-2334 5158
+1240%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 December 2011 8 September 2021
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron G460 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2334, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G460 and Xeon E-2334. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G460 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2334 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G460 and Xeon E-2334, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G460
Celeron G460
Intel Xeon E-2334
Xeon E-2334

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 30 votes

Rate Celeron G460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Xeon E-2334 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G460 or Xeon E-2334, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.