Atom N2600 vs Celeron G440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G440
2011
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.26
+13%
Atom N2600
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 3 Watt
0.23

Celeron G440 outperforms Atom N2600 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G440 and Atom N2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31333179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.705.44
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date4 September 2011 (13 years ago)1 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$45$47

Detailed specifications

Celeron G440 and Atom N2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G440 and Atom N2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt3.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G440 and Atom N2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron G440 and Atom N2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G440 and Atom N2600 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G440 and Atom N2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB2.44 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G440 and Atom N2600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G440 and Atom N2600.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G440 0.26
+13%
Atom N2600 0.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G440 420
+16.7%
Atom N2600 360

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.23
Recency 4 September 2011 1 December 2011
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 3 Watt

Celeron G440 has a 13% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom N2600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G440 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N2600 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G440 is a desktop processor while Atom N2600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G440 and Atom N2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G440
Celeron G440
Intel Atom N2600
Atom N2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 52 votes

Rate Celeron G440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 182 votes

Rate Atom N2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G440 or Atom N2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.