EPYC 9654 vs Celeron G3950

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3950
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.49
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
77.10
+5074%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Celeron G3950 by a whopping 5074% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3950 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.831.28
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Power efficiency2.7119.89
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3950 has 121% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3950 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3024
L1 cache128 KB6 MB
L2 cache512 KB96 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3950 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA1151SP5
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3950 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron G3950 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3950 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3950 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3950 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3950 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3950 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3950 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3950 1.49
EPYC 9654 77.10
+5074%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3950 2322
EPYC 9654 120176
+5076%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 77.10
Recency 3 January 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 360 Watt

Celeron G3950 has 605.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 5074.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3950 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G3950 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3950 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3950
Celeron G3950
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 992 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3950 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.