Celeron T3000 vs G3930

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron G3930 Core i3-7100 Core i3-7100T Core i5-7400 Core i5-7500 Core i5-7500T Core i5-7600 Core i5-7600K Core i7-7700 Core i7-7700K Pentium G4560 Pentium G4600
VS
Celeron T1600 Celeron T1700 Celeron T3000 Celeron T3100 Celeron T3300 Celeron T3500

Contents

Celeron G3930 Celeron G3930
Celeron T3000 Celeron T3000

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2192not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.69no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.62no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)no data
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA1151PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3930 2249
+227%
Celeron T3000 687

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G3930 605
+169%
Celeron T3000 225

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G3930 1034
+169%
Celeron T3000 384

Pros & cons summary

Recency 3 January 2017 1 April 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron G3930 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron T3000, on the other hand, has 45.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G3930 is a desktop processor while Celeron T3000 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3930 and Celeron T3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron G3930
Celeron G3930
Intel Celeron T3000
Celeron T3000
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron G3930 Celeron G3930
vs
Athlon II X3 425e Athlon II X3 425e
Celeron T3000 Celeron T3000
vs
E1-2150 E1 2150
Celeron G3930 Celeron G3930
vs
Athlon II X4 640 Athlon II X4 640
Pentium Dual T4500 Pentium Dual Core T4500
vs
Pentium 4 2.66 Pentium 4 2.66
Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
vs
i3-1220P Core i3 1220P
Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
vs
i7-1255U Core i7 1255U
Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
vs
i7-1265U Core i7 1265U
Athlon 64 4000+ Athlon 64 4000+
vs
Athlon 64 FX-60 Athlon 64 FX-60
i5-7600T Core i5 7600T
vs
i3-7300T Core i3 7300T
Core 2 Duo T6570 Core 2 Duo T6570
vs
Atom Z620 Atom Z620
Athlon 1200 Athlon 1200
vs
Ryzen 7 2700 Ryzen 7 2700
A4-6300 A4 6300
vs
Athlon 300U Athlon 300U
i7-4720HQ Core i7 4720HQ
vs
i5-760 Core i5 760

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 237 votes

Rate Celeron G3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Celeron T3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3930 or Celeron T3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.