Celeron J1900 vs G3900T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900T
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.32
+76%

Celeron G3900T outperforms Celeron J1900 by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900T and Celeron J1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22762671
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.446.84
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900T and Celeron J1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.42 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache128 KB224 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900T and Celeron J1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900T and Celeron J1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Celeron G3900T and Celeron J1900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900T and Celeron J1900 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900T and Celeron J1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency950 MHz854 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3900T and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3900T and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3900T and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900T and Celeron J1900.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900T 1.32
+76%
Celeron J1900 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3900T 2020
+75.5%
Celeron J1900 1151

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G3900T 554
+220%
Celeron J1900 173

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G3900T 986
+91.5%
Celeron J1900 515

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.32 0.75
Recency 19 October 2015 1 November 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron G3900T has a 76% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J1900, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 250% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G3900T is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900T and Celeron J1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900T
Celeron G3900T
Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 25 votes

Rate Celeron G3900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 195 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900T or Celeron J1900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.