Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Celeron G3900E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.28
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
14.08
+1000%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms Celeron G3900E by a whopping 1000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2288523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency3.4447.34
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date2 January 2016 (8 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s54 MHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataFP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 510AMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G3900E 1.28
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 14.08
+1000%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G3900E 2034
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22366
+1000%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 14.08
Integrated graphics card 1.61 20.24
Recency 2 January 2016 1 October 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron G3900E has -87.5% more threads.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 1000% higher aggregate performance score, 1157.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900E or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.