Mobile Sempron SI-40 vs Celeron G3900E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G3900E
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.28
+540%
Mobile Sempron SI-40
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.20

Celeron G3900E outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-40 by a whopping 540% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22783216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.17no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Mobile Sempron
Power efficiency3.460.76
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Sable (2008−2009)
Release date2 January 2016 (8 years ago)4 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s1800 MHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataS1g2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125V
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 510no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 0.20
Recency 2 January 2016 4 July 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron G3900E has a 540% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Sempron SI-40, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G3900E is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron SI-40 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G3900E
Celeron G3900E
AMD Mobile Sempron SI-40
Mobile Sempron SI-40

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron G3900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 35 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron SI-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G3900E or Mobile Sempron SI-40, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.