Mobile Sempron SI-40 vs Celeron G3900E
Aggregate performance score
Celeron G3900E outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-40 by a whopping 540% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2278 | 3216 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.17 | no data |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Mobile Sempron |
Power efficiency | 3.46 | 0.76 |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Sable (2008−2009) |
Release date | 2 January 2016 (8 years ago) | 4 July 2008 (16 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 1800 MHz |
Multiplier | 24 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 98.57 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 1750 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | no data | S1g2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125V |
AES-NI | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 510 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.28 | 0.20 |
Recency | 2 January 2016 | 4 July 2008 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Celeron G3900E has a 540% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Sempron SI-40, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.
The Celeron G3900E is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron SI-40 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and Mobile Sempron SI-40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.