Celeron 1020E vs G3900E

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and Celeron 1020E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2291	2558
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.18	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	3.46	2.41
Architecture codename	Skylake (2015−2016)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date	2 January 2016 (8 years ago)	20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Celeron 1020E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	no data	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	2.2 GHz
Bus type	DMI 3.0	no data
Bus rate	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	24	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	64K (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	256K (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB	2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm
Die size	98.57 mm2	118 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	105 °C
Number of transistors	1750 Million	1,400 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Celeron 1020E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	no data	G2 (988B)
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Celeron 1020E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+

Security technologies

Celeron G3900E and Celeron 1020E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

no data

+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Celeron 1020E are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Celeron 1020E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	LPDDR3-1866	DDR3
Maximum memory size	64 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	34.134 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare

Intel HD Graphics 510

Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Celeron 1020E.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.28	0.89
Integrated graphics card	1.61	0.63
Recency	2 January 2016	20 January 2013
Chip lithography	14 nm	22 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and Celeron 1020E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---