Celeron 847 vs G1820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1820
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.08
+260%
Celeron 847
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.30

Celeron G1820 outperforms Celeron 847 by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1820 and Celeron 847 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24173109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.12no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.881.66
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 December 2013 (11 years ago)19 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$110$134

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1820 and Celeron 847 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz1.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size177 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1820 and Celeron 847 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1820 and Celeron 847. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Celeron G1820 and Celeron 847 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1820 and Celeron 847 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1820 and Celeron 847. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz800 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1820 and Celeron 847 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
VGA+no data
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1820 and Celeron 847 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1820 and Celeron 847 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1820 and Celeron 847.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1820 1.08
+260%
Celeron 847 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1820 1717
+259%
Celeron 847 478

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron G1820 488
+211%
Celeron 847 157

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron G1820 830
+217%
Celeron 847 262

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.08 0.30
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.34
Recency 1 December 2013 19 June 2011
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron G1820 has a 260% higher aggregate performance score, 126.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 847, on the other hand, has 211.8% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G1820 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 847 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1820 is a desktop processor while Celeron 847 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1820 and Celeron 847, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1820
Celeron G1820
Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 165 votes

Rate Celeron G1820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 386 votes

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1820 or Celeron 847, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.