Atom N2850 vs Celeron G1820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2407not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.12no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.89no data
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)5 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$110no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1150no data
Power consumption (TDP)53 Watt6,6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)
Max video memory1.7 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850.

PCIe versionUp to 3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2013 5 January 2012
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 53 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron G1820 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N2850, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 783.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G1820 is a desktop processor while Atom N2850 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1820 and Atom N2850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1820
Celeron G1820
Intel Atom N2850
Atom N2850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 165 votes

Rate Celeron G1820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Atom N2850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1820 or Atom N2850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.