Pentium G622 vs Celeron G1630

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1630 and Pentium G622 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2410not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.08no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.84no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)22 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1630 and Pentium G622 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size94 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data69 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1630 and Pentium G622 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA11551155
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1630 and Pentium G622. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Celeron G1630 and Pentium G622 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1630 and Pentium G622 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1630 and Pentium G622. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.1 GHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1630 and Pentium G622 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1630 and Pentium G622.

PCIe version2.02.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2013 22 May 2011
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron G1630 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G1630 and Pentium G622. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1630 and Pentium G622, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1630
Celeron G1630
Intel Pentium G622
Pentium G622

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 27 votes

Rate Celeron G1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium G622 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1630 or Pentium G622, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.