Ryzen 5 7545U vs Celeron G1620T
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G1620T and Ryzen 5 7545U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2485 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.40 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 2.60 | no data |
Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
Release date | 1 September 2013 (11 years ago) | 2 November 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $42 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron G1620T and Ryzen 5 7545U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 94 mm2 | 137 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 20,900 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G1620T and Ryzen 5 7545U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1155 | FP7 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1620T and Ryzen 5 7545U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
My WiFi | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron G1620T and Ryzen 5 7545U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | - | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1620T and Ryzen 5 7545U are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1620T and Ryzen 5 7545U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors | AMD Radeon 740M |
Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1620T and Ryzen 5 7545U integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1620T and Ryzen 5 7545U.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 14 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 September 2013 | 2 November 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7545U has an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G1620T and Ryzen 5 7545U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G1620T is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7545U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1620T and Ryzen 5 7545U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.