Turion II N550 vs Celeron G1610T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1610T
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.84
+52.7%
Turion II N550
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.55

Celeron G1610T outperforms Turion II N550 by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1610T and Turion II N550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25772831
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.67no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Turion II
Power efficiency2.271.49
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date3 December 2012 (11 years ago)4 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1610T and Turion II N550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s3600 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)265 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1610T and Turion II N550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1610T and Turion II N550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX, 3DNow!, SSE(1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0
AVX+-
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron G1610T and Turion II N550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1610T and Turion II N550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1610T and Turion II N550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1610T and Turion II N550 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1610T and Turion II N550.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1610T 0.84
+52.7%
Turion II N550 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1610T 1327
+51.3%
Turion II N550 877

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 0.55
Recency 3 December 2012 4 October 2010
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm

Celeron G1610T has a 52.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron G1610T is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II N550 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron G1610T is a desktop processor while Turion II N550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1610T and Turion II N550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1610T
Celeron G1610T
AMD Turion II N550
Turion II N550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 10 votes

Rate Celeron G1610T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Turion II N550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1610T or Turion II N550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.