i5-12400F vs Celeron G1101

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G1101
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 73 Watt
0.70
Core i5-12400F
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
12.53
+1690%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Celeron G1101 by a whopping 1690% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G1101 and Core i5-12400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2717619
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.9743.52
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.8917.90
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85$180

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-12400F has 4387% better value for money than Celeron G1101.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G1101 and Core i5-12400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors382 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G1101 and Core i5-12400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1101 and Core i5-12400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron G1101 and Core i5-12400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1101 and Core i5-12400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1101 and Core i5-12400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16.38 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HDno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1101 and Core i5-12400F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1101 and Core i5-12400F.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes120

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G1101 0.70
i5-12400F 12.53
+1690%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G1101 1086
i5-12400F 19532
+1699%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 12.53
Recency 7 January 2010 4 January 2022
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 65 Watt

i5-12400F has a 1690% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and 12.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-12400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1101 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1101 and Core i5-12400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G1101
Celeron G1101
Intel Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G1101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 13392 votes

Rate Core i5-12400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G1101 or Core i5-12400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.