Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Celeron E3400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.55
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
39.74
+7125%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron E3400 by a whopping 7125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking283065
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.7215.59
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency0.8013.43
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date17 January 2010 (14 years ago)25 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$76$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 319% better value for money than Celeron E3400.

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data8 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron E3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E3400 0.55
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 39.74
+7125%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E3400 869
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63129
+7165%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron E3400 290
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 1661
+473%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron E3400 485
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 13806
+2747%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 39.74
Recency 17 January 2010 25 November 2019
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron E3400 has 330.8% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, on the other hand, has a 7125.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3400 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3400
Celeron E3400
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 268 votes

Rate Celeron E3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 347 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3400 or Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.