Ultra 7 265KF vs Celeron E3400

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2830	73
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.72	100.00
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	0.80	29.54
Architecture codename	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date	17 January 2010 (14 years ago)	24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	$76	$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 7 265KF has 2588% better value for money than Celeron E3400.

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads	2	20
Base clock speed	2.6 GHz	3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.6 GHz	5.5 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	112 KB (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB (shared)	3 MB (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	45 nm	3 nm
Die size	82 mm2	243 mm2
Maximum core temperature	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	228 million	17,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	-	+
VID voltage range	0.85V-1.3625V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	LGA775	1851
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-

Security technologies

Celeron E3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe version	2.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.56	39.75
Recency	17 January 2010	24 October 2024
Physical cores	2	20
Threads	2	20
Chip lithography	45 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3400 and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---