Atom E645CT vs Celeron E3400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3400 and Atom E645CT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2830not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.80no data
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Stellarton (2010)
Release date17 January 2010 (14 years ago)22 November 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$76no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3400 and Atom E645CT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size82 mm226 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3400 and Atom E645CT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775Intel BGA1466
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3400 and Atom E645CT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron E3400 and Atom E645CT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3400 and Atom E645CT are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3400 and Atom E645CT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3400 and Atom E645CT.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 January 2010 22 November 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 4 Watt

Celeron E3400 has 100% more physical cores.

Atom E645CT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 1525% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E3400 and Atom E645CT. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron E3400 is a desktop processor while Atom E645CT is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3400 and Atom E645CT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3400
Celeron E3400
Intel Atom E645CT
Atom E645CT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 268 votes

Rate Celeron E3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Atom E645CT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3400 or Atom E645CT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.