Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Celeron E3200

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 FX-57 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2854	3077
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.88	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	0.77	0.30
Architecture codename	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	San Diego (2001−2005)
Release date	30 August 2009 (15 years ago)	June 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$52	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 FX-57 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB (shared)	1 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	45 nm	90 nm
Die size	82 mm2	115 mm2
Maximum core temperature	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	228 million	114 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	0.85V-1.3625V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 FX-57 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	LGA775	939
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	104 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 FX-57. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-

Security technologies

Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 FX-57 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 FX-57 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 FX-57. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 FX-57.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.53	0.33
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	45 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	104 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3200 and Athlon 64 FX-57, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---