Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS vs Celeron E1600

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E1600
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.53
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
13.47
+2442%

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS outperforms Celeron E1600 by a whopping 2442% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2851549
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.7745.53
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date31 May 2009 (15 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die size77 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FP7
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron E1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon 760M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E1600 0.53
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS 13.47
+2442%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E1600 840
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS 21401
+2448%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 13.47
Recency 31 May 2009 16 April 2024
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS has a 2441.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E1600 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron E1600 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1600 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1600
Celeron E1600
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Celeron E1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1600 or Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.