Pentium 4 HT 640 vs Celeron E1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1200 and Pentium 4 HT 640 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release dateJanuary 2008 (16 years ago)February 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1200 and Pentium 4 HT 640 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)28 KB
L2 cache512 KB (shared)2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die size77 mm2109 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million169 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1200 and Pentium 4 HT 640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt84 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1200 and Pentium 4 HT 640. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1200 and Pentium 4 HT 640 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1200 and Pentium 4 HT 640 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1200 and Pentium 4 HT 640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 84 Watt

Celeron E1200 has 100% more physical cores, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 29.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E1200 and Pentium 4 HT 640. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1200 and Pentium 4 HT 640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1200
Celeron E1200
Intel Pentium 4 HT 640
Pentium 4 HT 640

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 39 votes

Rate Celeron E1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 52 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1200 or Pentium 4 HT 640, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.