Atom N570 vs Celeron E1200

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1200 and Atom N570 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release dateJanuary 2008 (16 years ago)1 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40$86

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1200 and Atom N570 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus rateno data666 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size77 mm287 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1200 and Atom N570 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1200 and Atom N570. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1200 and Atom N570 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1200 and Atom N570 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1200 and Atom N570. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E1200 516
+51.3%
Atom N570 341

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron E1200 196
+139%
Atom N570 82

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron E1200 343
+58.1%
Atom N570 217

Pros & cons summary


Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 8 Watt

Atom N570 has 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 712.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E1200 and Atom N570. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron E1200 is a desktop processor while Atom N570 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1200 and Atom N570, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1200
Celeron E1200
Intel Atom N570
Atom N570

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 39 votes

Rate Celeron E1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 131 vote

Rate Atom N570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1200 or Atom N570, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.