Atom C3808 vs Celeron E1200

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1200 and Atom C3808 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3078not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.47no data
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release dateJanuary 2008 (16 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40$369

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1200 and Atom C3808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64 KB (per core)672 KB
L2 cache512 KB (shared)12 MB
L3 cache0 KB12 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C86 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1200 and Atom C3808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1200 and Atom C3808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1200 and Atom C3808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1200 and Atom C3808 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1200 and Atom C3808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4: 2133
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E1200 and Atom C3808.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 25 Watt

Atom C3808 has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E1200 and Atom C3808. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron E1200 is a desktop processor while Atom C3808 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1200 and Atom C3808, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1200
Celeron E1200
Intel Atom C3808
Atom C3808

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron E1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1200 or Atom C3808, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.