E2-6110 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3100

Place in performance ranking	2591	2625
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron Dual-Core	AMD E-Series
Architecture codename	Penryn (2008−2011)	Beema (2014)
Release date	1 September 2009 (14 years ago)	29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and E2-6110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	2	4
Boost clock speed	1.9 GHz	1.5 GHz
Bus support	800 MHz	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
Chip lithography	45 nm	28 nm
Die size	107 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	410 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and E2-6110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	BGA479, PGA478	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and E2-6110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI	no data	+
AVX	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and E2-6110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 0.76
+4.1%

E2-6110 0.73

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 outperforms E2-6110 by 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 65%

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 1174
+4.3%

E2-6110 1126

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 outperforms E2-6110 by 4% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.76	0.73
Recency	1 September 2009	29 April 2014
Physical cores	2	4
Threads	2	4
Chip lithography	45 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 has a 4.1% higher aggregate performance score.

E2-6110, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and E2-6110.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3100 and E2-6110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.