Pentium III 1400S vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Aggregate performance score
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 outperforms Pentium III 1400S by a whopping 450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Pentium III 1400S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2753 | 3362 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.79 | 0.36 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Tualatin (2000−2002) |
| Release date | 7 December 2008 (16 years ago) | January 2002 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Pentium III 1400S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 80 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 44 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Pentium III 1400S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | 370 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 32 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.66 | 0.12 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 32 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 has a 450% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium III 1400S, on the other hand, has 9.4% lower power consumption.
The Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium III 1400S in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is a notebook processor while Pentium III 1400S is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Pentium III 1400S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
