Athlon 64 2700+ vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Athlon 64 2700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2732 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.80 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | NewCastle (2004) |
| Release date | 7 December 2008 (15 years ago) | April 2004 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Athlon 64 2700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 144 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 69 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Athlon 64 2700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 32 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 32 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T1700 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 64 2700+, on the other hand, has 9.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Athlon 64 2700+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and Athlon 64 2700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
