A9-9420e vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700

Place in the ranking	2750	2720
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron Dual-Core	AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency	1.81	4.41
Architecture codename	Merom (2006−2008)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	7 December 2008 (16 years ago)	1 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A9-9420e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Boost clock speed	1.83 GHz	no data
Bus rate	667 MHz	no data
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	28 nm
Die size	143 mm²	124.5 mm²
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	90 °C
Number of transistors	291 Million	1200 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A9-9420e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	PPGA478	BGA
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A9-9420e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions

no data

Virtualization,

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A9-9420e are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A9-9420e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 0.67

A9-9420e 0.70
+4.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 1058

A9-9420e 1107
+4.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.67	0.70
Recency	7 December 2008	1 June 2018
Chip lithography	65 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt

A9-9420e has a 4.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A9-9420e.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A9-9420e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.