A6-7000 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T1700
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.67
+4.7%
A6-7000
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.64

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 outperforms A6-7000 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A6-7000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27502779
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency1.813.56
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date7 December 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A6-7000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A6-7000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478FT3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A6-7000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A6-7000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A6-7000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A6-7000.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 0.67
+4.7%
A6-7000 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 1058
+4.8%
A6-7000 1010

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 0.64
Recency 7 December 2008 1 June 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 has a 4.7% higher aggregate performance score.

A6-7000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A6-7000.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A6-7000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Celeron Dual-Core T1700
AMD A6-7000
A6-7000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 14 votes

Rate A6-7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1700 or A6-7000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.