A4 Micro-6400T vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T1700
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.67
A4 Micro-6400T
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
0.68
+1.5%

A4 Micro-6400T outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1700 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A4 Micro-6400T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27502739
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.8114.30
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Mullins (2014)
Release date7 December 2008 (16 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A4 Micro-6400T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L2 cache1 MB2048 KB
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A4 Micro-6400T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A4 Micro-6400T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A4 Micro-6400T are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A4 Micro-6400T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1333
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A4 Micro-6400T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A4 Micro-6400T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A4 Micro-6400T.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 0.67
A4 Micro-6400T 0.68
+1.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 1058
A4 Micro-6400T 1082
+2.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 1750
+39.9%
A4 Micro-6400T 1251

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 3270
A4 Micro-6400T 3380
+3.4%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 1456
A4 Micro-6400T 1664
+14.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 0.68
Recency 7 December 2008 29 April 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 4 Watt

A4 Micro-6400T has a 1.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 775% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A4 Micro-6400T.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1700 and A4 Micro-6400T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Celeron Dual-Core T1700
AMD A4 Micro-6400T
A4 Micro-6400T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A4 Micro-6400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1700 or A4 Micro-6400T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.