Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated553
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiencyno data84.54
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache512 KB6 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2008 23 May 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U has an age advantage of 15 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1500 or Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.