Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs Dual-Core T1500
Aggregate performance score
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3008 | 2980 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Power efficiency | 1.09 | 1.14 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Merom-2M (2008) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.40 | 0.42 |
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 has a 5% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
