Athlon II X2 210e vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Aggregate performance score
Athlon II X2 210e outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon II X2 210e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2988 | 2708 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.08 | 1.47 |
Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Regor (2009−2013) |
Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 21 September 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon II X2 210e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | no data | 117 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 410 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon II X2 210e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | AM3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon II X2 210e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon II X2 210e.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.40 | 0.70 |
Recency | 1 May 2008 | 21 September 2010 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 has 28.6% lower power consumption.
Athlon II X2 210e, on the other hand, has a 75% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Athlon II X2 210e is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X2 210e is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon II X2 210e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.