Athlon II X2 210e vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T1500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.40
Athlon II X2 210e
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 45 Watt
0.70
+75%

Athlon II X2 210e outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon II X2 210e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29882708
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Power efficiency1.081.47
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon II X2 210e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data117 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon II X2 210e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon II X2 210e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon II X2 210e.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 0.70
Recency 1 May 2008 21 September 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core T1500 has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X2 210e, on the other hand, has a 75% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon II X2 210e is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X2 210e is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Athlon II X2 210e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
AMD Athlon II X2 210e
Athlon II X2 210e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 25 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 210e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T1500 or Athlon II X2 210e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.