Ryzen Embedded R1305G vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Embedded R1305G outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a whopping 347% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen Embedded R1305G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2974 | 1967 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 1.16 | 18.17 |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2M (2008) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 25 February 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen Embedded R1305G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 209.8 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,950 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen Embedded R1305G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | P | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 8 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen Embedded R1305G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen Embedded R1305G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen Embedded R1305G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen Embedded R1305G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.43 | 1.92 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 25 February 2020 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 8 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded R1305G has a 346.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 337.5% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen Embedded R1305G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Ryzen Embedded R1305G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
