Athlon II N370 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1400
Aggregate performance score
Athlon II N370 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II N370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2974 | 2834 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | AMD Athlon II |
| Power efficiency | 1.16 | 1.54 |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2M (2008) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 16 December 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II N370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 117.5 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 234 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II N370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | P | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II N370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II N370 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II N370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.43 | 0.57 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 16 December 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Athlon II N370 has a 32.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Athlon II N370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1400 and Athlon II N370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
