Athlon II X2 220 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.30
Athlon II X2 220
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.66
+120%

Athlon II X2 220 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II X2 220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30972744
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.30
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Power efficiency2.840.96
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II X2 220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II X2 220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956AM3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II X2 220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II X2 220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II X2 220.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 0.30
Athlon II X2 220 0.66
+120%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 482
Athlon II X2 220 1043
+116%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 0.66
Recency 1 September 2009 21 September 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 has 550% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X2 220, on the other hand, has a 120% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Athlon II X2 220 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X2 220 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II X2 220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
AMD Athlon II X2 220
Athlon II X2 220

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 231 vote

Rate Athlon II X2 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 or Athlon II X2 220, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.