Athlon XP 2000+ vs Celeron D 352

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron D 352
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 86 Watt
0.17
+41.7%
Athlon XP 2000+
2002
1 core / 1 thread, 70 Watt
0.12

Celeron D 352 outperforms Athlon XP 2000+ by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 352 and Athlon XP 2000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32753355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.190.16
Architecture codenameCedar Mill (2006)Thorton (2001−2003)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)January 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$25

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 352 and Athlon XP 2000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.67 GHz
L1 cache16 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm180 nm
Die size109 mm2150 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors125 million63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.325Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 352 and Athlon XP 2000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPLGA775A
Power consumption (TDP)86 Watt70 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 352 and Athlon XP 2000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 352 and Athlon XP 2000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 352 and Athlon XP 2000+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 352 and Athlon XP 2000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron D 352 0.17
+41.7%
Athlon XP 2000+ 0.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron D 352 274
+40.5%
Athlon XP 2000+ 195

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.12
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 86 Watt 70 Watt

Celeron D 352 has a 41.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon XP 2000+, on the other hand, has 22.9% lower power consumption.

The Celeron D 352 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon XP 2000+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 352 and Athlon XP 2000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 352
Celeron D 352
AMD Athlon XP 2000+
Athlon XP 2000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 35 votes

Rate Celeron D 352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 43 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 352 or Athlon XP 2000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.