C-30 vs Celeron D 350
Primary details
Comparing Celeron D 350 and C-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3371 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD C-Series |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.16 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Ontario (2011−2012) |
| Release date | June 2005 (19 years ago) | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron D 350 and C-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.25V-1.4V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron D 350 and C-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 350 and C-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 40 nm, 1.24-1.35V |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron D 350 and C-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 350 and C-30 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 350 and C-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR3 Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6250 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 9 Watt |
C-30 has a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 711.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron D 350 and C-30. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron D 350 is a desktop processor while C-30 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 350 and C-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
