Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Celeron D 341

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 341 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2947
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data0.47
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release dateSeptember 2004 (20 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 341 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed2.93 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache16 KB256 KB
L2 cache256 KB512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size109 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors125 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 341 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPLGA478,PLGA775AM2
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 341 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 341 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 341 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 341 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 89 Watt

Celeron D 341 has 6% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 341 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 341 and Athlon 64 X2 4000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 341
Celeron D 341
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Athlon 64 X2 4000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 14 votes

Rate Celeron D 341 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 190 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 341 or Athlon 64 X2 4000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.