Turion 64 ML-30 vs Celeron D 335

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 335 and Turion 64 ML-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataTurion 64
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)March 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 335 and Turion 64 ML-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache16 KB128 KB
L2 cache256 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size109 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistors125 million114 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 335 and Turion 64 ML-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478754
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 335 and Turion 64 ML-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 335 and Turion 64 ML-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 335 and Turion 64 ML-30 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 335 and Turion 64 ML-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2no data

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 35 Watt

Turion 64 ML-30 has 108.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 335 and Turion 64 ML-30. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron D 335 is a desktop processor while Turion 64 ML-30 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 335 and Turion 64 ML-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 335
Celeron D 335
AMD Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 28 votes

Rate Celeron D 335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 335 or Turion 64 ML-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.