N100 vs Celeron D 335

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 335 and N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiencyno data54.38
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)no data
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 335 and N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache16 KBno data
L2 cache256 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography90 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size109 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature67 °C105 °C
Number of transistors125 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 335 and N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 335 and N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron D 335 and N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 335 and N100 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 335 and N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron D 335 and N100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron D 335 and N100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron D 335 and N100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron D 335 and N100.

PCI Express lanesno data9
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 6 Watt

N100 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 1116.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 335 and N100. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron D 335 is a desktop processor while N100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 335 and N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 335
Celeron D 335
Intel N100
N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 28 votes

Rate Celeron D 335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 187 votes

Rate N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 335 or N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.