EPYC 9135 vs Celeron D 335

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron D 335 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated96
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.26
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiencyno data17.29
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Turin (2024)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron D 335 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache16 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die size109 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistors125 million16,630 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.25V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron D 335 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketPPGA478SP5
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 335 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron D 335 and EPYC 9135 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 335 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 335 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron D 335 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron D 335 has 174% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron D 335 and EPYC 9135. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron D 335 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 335 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron D 335
Celeron D 335
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 28 votes

Rate Celeron D 335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron D 335 or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.